Pemanfaatan Robotika untuk Meningkatkan Minat Belajar Sains pada Anak Sekolah
Main Article Content
Abstract
Penelitian ini membahas pemanfaatan robotika untuk meningkatkan minat belajar sains pada anak sekolah. Robotika memungkinkan pembelajaran yang lebih interaktif, aplikatif, dan menarik, sehingga mampu meningkatkan motivasi serta pemahaman siswa terhadap konsep sains. Studi ini menggunakan metode kualitatif deskriptif dengan analisis literatur untuk mengeksplorasi manfaat, implementasi, serta tantangan dalam penerapan robotika di pendidikan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa robotika dapat meningkatkan keterlibatan siswa, mengembangkan keterampilan abad ke-21, serta memperkuat pemahaman konsep STEM. Namun, hambatan seperti keterbatasan biaya, kesiapan guru, dan akses teknologi masih menjadi tantangan utama. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan dukungan dari sekolah, pelatihan bagi guru, serta kebijakan pendidikan yang mendukung integrasi robotika dalam kurikulum. Temuan ini mengindikasikan bahwa pendekatan berbasis teknologi, termasuk robotika, dapat menjadi strategi inovatif dalam meningkatkan efektivitas pembelajaran sains di sekolah.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
Alimisis, D. (2021). Educational Robotics in the Era of Industry 4.0: A New Paradigm for Learning.
Springer.
Anwar, S., Bascou, N., Menekse, M., & Kardgar, A. (2021). A systematic review of studies on
educational robotics. Journal of STEM Education Research, 4(1), 25-45.
Belpaeme, T., Kennedy, J., Ramachandran, A., Scassellati, B., & Tanaka, F. (2021). Social robots for
education: A review. Science Robotics, 6(58).
Benitti, F. B. V. (2020). Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review.
Computers & Education, 58(3), 978-988.
Bers, M. U. (2020). Coding as a Playground: Programming and Computational Thinking in the Early
Childhood Classroom. Routledge.
Bers, M. U. (2022). Beyond Coding: How Children Learn Human Values through Programming. MIT
Press.
Blanchard, M. R., Gutierrez, K. S., & Schultz, S. M. (2021). The effectiveness of digital simulations
for science education: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 43(4), 567-
Chalmers, C., Carter, M., Cooper, T., & Nason, R. (2022). A systematic review of the use of robotics
in primary and secondary education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher
Education, 19(1), 22.
Chang, C. Y., Hwang, G. J., & Liu, Z. F. (2020). A systematic review of research on AI-assisted
learning: Applications and implications. Educational Technology & Society, 23(3), 1-15.
Cheng, G., Sun, J., & Chen, X. (2021). Integrating educational robotics to foster problem-solving skills:
A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 172, 104271.
Creswell, J. W. (2021). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches
(5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2020). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (5th ed.). SAGE
Publications.
Eguchi, A. (2020). Robotics as a Learning Tool for Educational Transformation. International Journal
of Social Robotics, 12(3), 567–578.
Gumilang, Y. S., Rozaq, A., Sonalitha, E., Rabi, A., Sumarahinsih, A., Krisdianto, & Fahreza, M. A.
(2023). Pengenalan dan Pelatihan Robotika Sederhana untuk Membangun Minat STEM pada
Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Abdimas BSI, 9(1), 1-8.
Hussain, M., Lindh, J., & Shukur, G. (2021). The role of problem-based learning in developing STEM
education skills using robotics. European Journal of Engineering Education, 46(5), 755-774.
Kim, C., Jeong, H., & Lee, J. (2021). The impact of social robots on enhancing student engagement in
STEM education: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 167, 104181.
Kim, Y. R., Choi, M., & Lee, J. (2022). Gamification in educational robotics: Enhancing student
motivation and learning outcomes. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(4), 568-589.
Kuo, Y. C., Belland, B. R., & Janak, E. A. (2022). Scaffolding and motivation in game-based learning
environments: A review of literature. Educational Psychology Review, 34(2), 487-511.
Latip, A. (2020). Minat Belajar Peserta Didik SMP pada Pembelajaran STEM dengan Media Robot
Edukasi. Jurnal Literasi Pendidikan Fisika, 1(2), 86-94.
López, J., Sáez-López, J. M., & Miralles-Martínez, P. (2021). Arduino in STEM education: A review
of research and practice. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 30(3), 415-431.
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2022). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation
(4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2020). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (3rd
ed.). SAGE Publications.
Mubin, O., Stevens, C. J., Shahid, S., Mahmud, A. A., & Dong, J. (2021). A review of the applicability
of robots in education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 30(1), 65–85.
Nagchaudhuri, A., Singh, G., & Brown, S. (2022). VEX Robotics as a platform for STEM education
and outreach. Journal of STEM Education, 23(1), 78-92.
Papadakis, S. (2022). The use of educational robotics for early childhood STEM education: A review
of the literature. Education and Information Technologies, 27(5), 7055–7081.